5 Simple Techniques For h4831sc load data

5 Simple Techniques For h4831sc load data

Blog Article

I am an actual fan in the H4831 powder. I get terrific velocity and accuracy from any caliber I have experimented with it in. Within the 25-06 up on the 338 it is actually my check out powder of option. I test all sorts of powders when Performing up loads, although the H4831 usually seems to come out on prime for accuracy and velocity when the case is on the 06 course or much larger.

I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was building additional pressure and was slower as opposed to outdated stuff. I don't recall if I even tried typical h4831 or not; I'm pondering not. Simply click to broaden...

Can they be interchanged without anxieties other then utilizing ordinary load techniques when switching from large amount to great deal?

Sweet!! I am going to decide on some up and provides it a check out. Thanks fellas, I take pleasure in it! I'll let you know what I find out. I do have a few 50 % pound of 4350 I'm able to consider that first and find out what transpires.

Anyway, I knew the two lbs . of H4831SC utilised exactly the same data, but I didn't know regardless of whether there was something various between a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and just one not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon verified which they have been in actual fact similar and the only variance was the logo within the label.

I'm sure, tough occasions. H4831SC will definitely get the job done, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded long. I don't keep in mind powder charge off the very best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which is exactly where I typically goal for being. As part of your scenario making use of what you may have (and what I must have accomplished) I would get started with the top on the bearing floor in the bullet proper in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you find a velocity node.

I am applying it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did nicely but I used to be a little bit concerned about temp h4831sc balance. I feel I am at 72 grains and acquire all-around 2850ish fps

Like explained higher than, exact stuff. All that differs is the size of your kernels. I did hear someplace that they're going to only make the SC Later on. I don't know if that is certainly correct or not but would seem sensible to me. I use SC because that is definitely what I located in the eight lb jug and it works.

Using the smoother move features will come far more uniform demand weights, when the individual grains orient far more compactly, h4831 vs h4831sc making far better loading density.

locutus reported: I continue to have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows through my powder steps easily.

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, They are fully h4831sc unique powders, with IMR 4831 remaining significantly faster compared to the Hodgdon variants. Do not deal with them as the identical powder, as they most undoubtedly usually are not.

The "SC" means Limited Lower. I have never recognized a difference between possibly powder dut I don't think I'd personally combine them.

I know the H4831SC offers a much better load density But I do think I have enough place in my case for the traditional H4831.

NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a limited source of Varget, in addition to a lot extra out there H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Practically exclusively, simply because that's just what the rifles shoot the most beneficial.